[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] H.264 interlaced crop fate test

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 07:38:57AM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:23:07AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:10:15PM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I don't think it's controversial, but since I have to wait for rsync anyway...
> > > Please raise any objections by tomorrow or after that on -cvslog :-)
> > 
> > does this really need that many frames to be decoded?
> 
> No, 1 or 2 or so should be enough.
> 
> > and do we already have a test that tests the max frames cmd line parameter?
> 
> Probably not.
> I take this to mean you'd rather have the below?
> I have no idea if it makes a difference where I put -vframes and which is
> better to test...

lgtm


[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20101104/a0d59b22/attachment.pgp>