[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bug Bounty

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Jan 30 13:22:27 CET 2010

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
> > > Do you distinguish between bugs and feature requests in this proposal? 
> > 
> > The proposal was just about bugs, we could extend it to includ feature
> > requests, we could also try it first like it is and decide later if we
> > want to extend it to include feature requests. ive no real oppinon here
> > 
> > also to clarify what i counted in my statistic, its simply all open and new
> > bugs, substatus was ignored.
> Again, that is the question I tried to raise:
> There are open feature requests with type "bug", there are bugs that were
> clearly reproduced with status "new" and there are issues with status "new" that
> might or might not be bugs. (All old issues and all status and not substatus).

what matters is what it is not what it is written in the type and status
that said type & status should be corrected if they dont match the reality


Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your
own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100130/64f6d2ac/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list