[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] allow non-repeating pulse vectors in ff_set_fixed_vector()
Fri Jan 29 03:16:51 CET 2010
Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Vitor,
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
>>> On Jan 28, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
>>>>> $subj, used in WMAVoice and adapted from a previous patch by Mans'
>>>>> suggestions on how to make optimal code with gcc. The nice thing is
>>>>> that the default behaviour (repeat) can be done in a one-liner for all
>>>>> items in the array, whereas complex behaviour (like WMAVoice,
>>>>> no-repeat) can be done in ways that punishes that decoder alone, not
>>>>> others. (hence the "no-repeat" instead of "repeat").
>>>> Missing changes in siprdec.c (passing AMRFixed.no_repeat_mask
>>>> uninitialized is a bad idea).
>>>> Besides that, ok if tested not to break SIPR.
>>> But it doesn't actually use it, do you still want me to set it?
>> sipr16k.c uses ff_set_fixed_vector(). Unless I'm missing something,
>> AMRFixed.no_repeat_mask = 0 behaves as the current code and
>> AMRFixed.no_repeat_mask = 0xfffff does something different. Since
>> sipr16k alloc AMRFixed on the stack, AMRFixed.no_repeat_mask is
>> initialized to random junk.
> ff_parse_10pulses_35bits() is changed in the patch already, see the
> acelp_vectors.c changes.
Yes, but what about ff_sipr_decode_frame_16k()?
More information about the ffmpeg-devel