[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Add SIPR decoder for 5k0, 6k5 and 8k5 modes
Vitor Sessak
vitor1001
Sun Jan 10 22:43:18 CET 2010
Vitor Sessak wrote:
> Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi Vitor,
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Vitor Sessak <vitor1001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> in: { 2, 2.2, 7, 9.5, 10 }
>>> out: { 2, 4, 7, 9.5, 10 }
>>> ff_acelp_reorder_lsf(): { 2, 4, 7, 9.5, 11.5}
>>> sane: { 2, 4, 7, 9.5, 11.5}
>>>
>>> here we see a problem
>>
>> Ah, I see what you mean, min_dist is not enforced for the last lsf.
>> Very interesting. For WMAVoice, that's not the case, it's exactly like
>> the int version. OK, I guess that makes the discussion moot then.
>>
>> Does output quality audibly differ when adding in this "feature"? (It
>> might just be a decoder bug, WMAVoice is full of them.) Deviating from
>> binary can sometimes be OK...
>>
>> If the output doesn't change or worsens, patch OK (but please explain
>> this difference in a doxy); if it improves, it might be worth using
>> that instead.
>
> No, the output gets completely garbled if I do like in
> ff_acelp_reorder_lsf().
>
> Does anyone else wants to comment/review this codec? If nobody comment
> in a couple of days I'll commit it.
Committed.
Now the patch that adds 16k support. I'm undecided if I should put this
code in a separated file...
-Vitor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sipr_16k.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 46187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100110/b9e9153f/attachment.bin>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list