[FFmpeg-devel] Linking against lame considered non-free?
Sun Aug 15 14:30:25 CEST 2010
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> For full context, please see
> Short summary, the Lame licsense places additional restrictions on its
> LGPL license, as seen in
I've had a quick look at the source code in libmp3lame, and the few
files I've had a look at all contained a straight LGPL header without
any additionnal restriction.
I'm not an expert, and this would require a deeper look, but to me it
looks like libmp3lame might be considered strictly LGPL v2+.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel