[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] enforce --enable-nonfree for lame Re: Linking against lame considered non-free?

[Benjamin Larsson]

On 15/08/10 09:40, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Speaking of GPL, I've just read GPLv3 paragraph 11 here. AFAIUI, the
> additional terms as expressed by the lame license are fully covered
> there. For this reason, distributing a conveying of libavcodec and
> libmp3lame under the GPLv3 should be OK. In that case, this patch to
> configure should do it:

So your interpretation is that a FFmpeg with lame would be promoted to
(l)gpl version 3 ?

MvH
Benjamin Larsson