[FFmpeg-devel] [FFMPEG] [PATCH] cavs encoder
Sat Nov 14 10:33:27 CET 2009
zhihang wang wrote:
> Yes, I guess such things have to be expected if an already published
>> specification is changed in a way which is not backwards compatible.
>> I am aware of that one additional marker_bit before the picture_distance
>> element in I picture headers. Are there any more - maybe more serious -
> Yes. for example, the intra prediction and the DCT are also changed.
I see. And there is really no way to see in the bitstream whether
the old way or the new way of doing things is the correct one?
More information about the ffmpeg-devel