[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G722 decoder

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Mar 24 01:03:36 CET 2009


On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> On 3/23/2009 12:11 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:01:42PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> >> On 3/23/2009 11:14 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:07:19AM -0700, Kenan Gillet wrote:
> >>>> On Mar 23, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:22:06AM -0700, Kenan Gillet wrote:
> >>>>>> On a side note, I think the G722 patch [1] should be removed or at  
> >>>>>> least
> >>>>>> a warning about its incompatible license should be added in the wiki.
> >>>>>> Will gladly do it if a consensus is reached.
> >>>>> You don't have a wiki account?  Send me an email with the login name  
> >>>>> you want...
> >>>> I do, just wanted to ask what would be the best course of action.
> >>> Add a note about the license incompatibility of course.  So that the
> >>> next person does not stumble into the same trap you fell into.
> >> I'm prefectly fine in integrating a patch using LGPL v2.1 only.
> > 
> > It's nice that you are fine with it, but changing FFmpeg's license is
> > not acceptable.  If just one file is LGPL v2.1 only, all of FFmpeg
> > reverts to LGPL v2.1 only and becomes incompatible with (L)GPL v3
> > software.
> 
> Is that true ? How so ?
> 
> > It's also clearly stated in point 1 of our development policy:
> > 
> > http://www.ffmpeg.org/general.html#SEC27
> 
> I don't remember agreeing with this, did I ?
> For me every contribution is nice, LGPL 2.1 is prefered, but I'm ok
> with MIT/BSD/Public Domain.
> I'm also more inclined to accept 2.1 than any "or later" clause.
> 
> I believe it is _suicidal_ to accept "or later" btw, who knows what evil
> forces could take over. This has raise many points with the GPL v3.

i dont like "or later" either

id like to kill gmx, they again managed to prevent me from receiving
mail for 9 hours, they are so fucking uter incompetent
</rant>
who is running gmx these days anyway? it wasnt that much crap years
ago

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give
it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For
even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090324/5e8ea0d7/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list