[FFmpeg-devel] release status

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:59:00PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:44:12PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > There has been a flurry of activity during the past days.  I must admit
> > > I have lost track of current issues.  So, are there any regression fixes
> > > pending or any regressions or nasty new bugs that need to be addressed?
> > > 
> > > Does HEAD compile and pass regression tests on all OSes and CPU
> > > architectures?  FATE looks reasonably green right now but I would
> > > like to hear more explicit OKs from you as well.
> > 
> > The sooner we release the sooner we are back to normal development
> > 
> > if you ask about outstanding issues, well
> > [...]
> 
> What I'm worried about are regressions, everything else is not
> a big deal.
> 
> > also all the timestamping stuff is moderately risky and can uncover other
> > bugs
> 
> I think moderately risky is an understatement.
> 
> > PS: It might make sense to do another release soon in case the above issue
> >     end up being fixed. But i think delaying this one more is not good.
> >     And i like to see the next done without a freeze of HEAD.
> 
> Have you seen anything held back by the freeze?  I did not.

just a second ago the reg tests passed my dozen fixes to the timestamping
code
iam holding that back, but iam not sure how long i will ;)
because ivans work will be simplified with it i think ...

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not
approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090301/d1975480/attachment.pgp>