[FFmpeg-devel] v210 vs. v210x

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:56:42PM -0700, Mike Melanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FFmpeg recently added support for 2 new video decoders: v210 and v210x. 
> v210 has a sample in our repository; v210x does not. Further, v210x does 
> not even have a textual description in 'ffmpeg -formats'
>
> What is v210x and how can I test the decoder?

there is/was a NewMobCal_YUV10_720p5994_ directory with .yuv10 files on some
public ftp, sadly google fails to find it
maybe someone remembers the url (and if so please put it in svn log)

I could upload some of it if we fail to find it, (the whole is >1gb and
that was the lowest resolution video there IIRC)

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090618/0ae9bef2/attachment.pgp>