[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] the future of libamr
Reinhard Tartler
siretart
Tue Jun 9 21:53:55 CEST 2009
I'm sorry to interrupt here, but you both seem to be miscommunicating
quite heavily.
Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> writes:
> You don't understand what I am trying to say here. This is about "you"
> using "I" instead of "we". This is not about "you" having a credibility
> problem if that is so, it is about "FFmpeg".
that would be appropriate if these negotations were lead on a public
mailing list like this. However are not. Instead, they happen in form of
a dialoge. A dialogue has exactly two participants, which means that the
separation between "I" and "us" is not a choice, but a matter of fact.
> When you are speaking on behalf of FFmpeg, I think you should always use
> "we" and "us".
I don't have the impression that Diego makes these negotiations on his
own account and know pretty well when the "I" and when the "we" is
appropriate.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list