[FFmpeg-devel] WinCE/ffmpeg hacks

Måns Rullgård mans
Thu Jul 30 09:00:28 CEST 2009


?smail D?nmez <ismail at namtrac.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:55:45PM +0300, ?smail D?nmez wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Martin Storsj?<martin at martin.st> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Ismail D?nmez wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Martin Storsj?<martin at martin.st> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Do you have time to reply to my questions below, either privately or on
>>> >> > the list? I'd like to know what differs in our setups, since you said that
>>> >> > you only need to modify errno.h but nothing else than that. Are you able
>>> >> > to build ffmpeg.exe and the mov demuxer with that setup?
>>> >>
>>> >> No, mov demuxer needs manual hacking since it uses sterror/errno
>>> >> combo. And you are correct, you still need to hack ?strerror(),
>>> >> perror(), getenv() and conio.h.
>>> >
>>> > Ok, good to know that our environments match in that respect, thanks.
>>>
>>> Looking at the hacks we need , we can't fix cegcc anymore because they
>>> try to emulate WinCE and not the C standard. For the remaining
>>
>> so its not a c compiler?
>> i think a c compiler is a requirement to compile ffmpeg
>
> Don't be mean Guru ;) This is all we got to compile on WinCE so we are
> sucking with it, without polluting FFmpeg and to this point we didn't
> add any gross hacks.

If there is any chance of fixing the build environment, that should be
attempted first.  If that fails, we can talk about hacks.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list