[FFmpeg-devel] Fw: [foms] Paper submissions to LCA
Sat Jul 18 05:11:58 CEST 2009
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:41:30AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 23:17 +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> > > [*] I think that the possibility to stream over RTP using the same code used
> > > for writing audio and video to a file is actually a cool feature that shows
> > > the power of the libav* framework... So, we could have a section about A/V
> > > muxers and talk about RTP streaming as a "special case" of this.
> > An easy target would be to describe the capabilities of FFmpeg works and how it
> > differs to other multimedia frameworks and projects. Use cases, such as your RTP
> > example, could be given to demonstrate its versitility.
> Yes, I was thinking about something similar.
> > I start putting pen
> > to paper this weekend. Catch me on IRC.
> I am not familiar with IRC, but I'll try later today or tomorrow.
> BTW, how will the paper be written? Is latex ok? Can we start to decide
> the basic paper structure (title, abstract, sections/subsections) so
> that people will be able to fill the various sections in a second time?
Plain-text or latex.
2. Motivation - explain how FFmpeg came about, and why it is imporant.
List the motivations of other multimedia projects (single-codec
proejcts, XAnim, SoX, etc).
Describe the architecure and define the concepts (containers, packets,
streams, etc.). Compare this to the projects cited in section 2.
4. Have dedicated sections for each libav* describing their capabilities
and/or_ walk the reader through a typical use case. Emphasis on
reuse of algorithms.
5. Build system/Project Management/Other
Opportunity to bag autotools.
Opportunity to bag ourselves.
(A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 AC40 DD6B)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel