[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] read header in FLAC demuxer

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Jan 31 18:26:19 CET 2009

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:47:53AM -0500, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > Justin Ruggles <justin.ruggles at gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> >> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >>> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:36:10PM -0500, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is a patch to read the header in the raw FLAC demuxer.  Currently
> >>>>> the header is passed through in the output AVPackets, which is not good
> >>>>> and requires some ugliness on the decoder side.  After this patch is
> >>>>> applied, the decoder can be changed so it doesn't have to handle the
> >>>>> header except in the extradata.  The extradata handling in the decoder
> >>>>> will also be simplified.
> >>>> is it allowed to place the header in the stream instead of extradata in
> >>>> flac in avi?
> >>> If it is physically possible, someone will do it.
> >> Should we really support everything that is physically possible?
> > 
> > Of course not.
> > 
> >> FLAC in avi and wav should not have the header in the stream.
> > 
> > Flac in avi and wav simply shouldn't IMO.  In fact, avi shouldn't at
> > all, and wav is only useful for PCM.
> > 
> >>>> flac in mkv?
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >>>> flac in * ?
> >>> There's always Ogg...
> >> Ogg doesn't use the raw FLAC header. It splits it up in its own funny
> >> way, which we already support.
> >>
> >> Do we have any other format that is header+frames that we allow the
> >> header to be in the stream?
> > 
> > It's possible to do all sorts of funny things with MPEG-PS/TS.  Some
> > variants of AAC encapsulation put (parts of) the header outside the
> > main stream, some put it all inline.
> But raw FLAC doesn't do any funny things... There is a header, which
> contains metadata, information about the stream, seek table, etc... It
> is always completely separate from the audio frames.  If we only handle
> it in the parser or decoder, we lose the ability to use that information
> in the demuxer, right?

i dont see why handling the seektable or others in the raw demuxer would
affect if its passed on or not to the parser, of course theres no point
on passing the seektable to the parser but still one could if one wanted

About the rest of the header i dont know how or where to handle it best
but what you apparently propose is not adding any features its not making
code simpler it just removes support for having the headers inline

If you want to add support for something iam very much in favor for that
and if you explain how that might conflict with inline headers i also
dont mind loosing support for them assuming such files are practically
non existent but 
Just removing it (or even worse in this patch duplicating it first)
with no real explanation why is something that feels odd ...
also moving code should never be split in duplication and removial

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not
approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090131/17c7c7bd/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list