[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH][VAAPI][2/6] Add common data structures and helpers
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Thu Feb 26 22:47:27 CET 2009
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>
> >>>>> +/** \brief Allocate a new VA API render state structure. */
> >>>>> +struct vaapi_render_state *av_alloc_vaapi_render_state(void);
> >>>>
> >>>> do i understand correctly that the use provided get_buffer() is called and
> >>>> then the user calls av_alloc_vaapi_render_state()?
> >>>> this is ugly
> >>>> either lavc should already call av_alloc_vaapi_render_state() before
> >>>> get_buffer()
> >>>> or it should be done in default_get_buffer() and the users get_buffer() should
> >>>> call default_get_buffer()
> >>>> or allocate it by avpicture_alloc()
> >>>> i dunno which of these would be cleanest ...
> >>>
> >>> I agree that we shall not depend on a specific AVFrame::data[0] to stuff
> >>> the HW accelerator data in. We should not delegate the call to
> >>> default_get_buffer() to the user as he would certainly forget about it.
> >>>
> >>
> >>> Why not use an hwaccel_data member for it? Though, in that case, data[0]
> >>> shall not be NULL for correct operation of h264.
> >>
> >> iam ok with that.
> >
> > The problem is then what to fill in data[0]. It cannot be NULL, it cannot
> > be "constant" (for all allocs) either. If the HW accelerator cannot handle
> > surface pixels readback, this shall be valid. If it does support that, it
> > would have allocated data[0-2] accordingly and those allocations naturally
> > yield different pointers, so no problem in that case.
> >
> > I see two solutions:
> >
> > - Make data[0] a linearly increasing ID just to make sure any allocated
> > AVFrame::data[0] is different
> >
> > - Replace: h->default_ref_list[0][i].data[0] ==
> > h->default_ref_list[1][i].data[0] with some ff_compare_picture() which
> > handles hwaccel_data. However, this could be a frequent function call. So,
> > make it static inline in mpegvideo_common.h?
>
> Having lavc allocate *_render_state structs sounds good but in practise,
> that's not really the ideal solution for MPlayer. How a ::get_image()
> could retrieve that hwaccel_data member? MPI allocation is well hidden
> mpcodecs_get_image() and it completely doesn't mind about AVFrame.
you could use data[3] for the hwacell struct that would leave 0-2 for
YV12 pixels
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Complexity theory is the science of finding the exact solution to an
approximation. Benchmarking OTOH is finding an approximation of the exact
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090226/d74bb451/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list