[FFmpeg-devel] PixFmtInfo cleanup
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Mon Feb 23 03:06:51 CET 2009
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 05:58:59PM -0800, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/22/2009 5:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > uint8_t log2_chroma_w; ///< chroma_width = -((-luma_width )>>log2_chroma_w)
> > uint8_t log2_chroma_h; ///< chroma_height= -((-luma_height)>>log2_chroma_h)
>
> Please don't try to do a contest on getting the most obfuscated API ever
> designed. I'm all for this new API, and I'm also all for designing it to
> make it obvious and simple.
>
> IMHO this is too much.
We already have these 2 fields in pixfmtinfo and we do need them
above is a unambigous definition of their meaning.
I surely agree with you that this should be written in english first
before this C code based definition in the comments
but its essential that chroma_width/height is calculated that way because
otherwise your code will be exploitable.
example YV12
width=5
chroma_width= -((-5)>>1) = 3
if instead you do 5>>1 you get 2 which would allocate a image that is
too small
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no
further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090223/0a8e7516/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list