[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Create a libavutil/pix_fmt.h with the pixel format stuff

[Stefano Sabatini]

On date Saturday 2009-02-21 15:47:27 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> 
> > On date Saturday 2009-02-21 15:34:50 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 03:28:18PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >> > On date Friday 2009-02-20 21:08:55 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> >> > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:29:45PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >> > > > On date Thursday 2009-02-19 22:00:59 +0100, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> >> > > > > > > First step creates a pix_fmt.h header (PixFmtInfo would then be added
> >> > > > > > > to libavutil/pix_fmt.c)
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > PixFmtInfo as is is too bloated, it requires cleanup _first_
> >> > > > > > also your patch misses installing the new header while a installed header
> >> > > > > > depends on it
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Yes.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Also I'm not sure if pixfmt.h (no underscore) is a better name.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Uh, patch missing...
> >> > > 
> >> > > probably ok
> >> > 
> >> > This changes the public interface,
> >> 
> >> how so?
> >
> > She (the user) was used to do:
> > #include <libavutil/avutil.h>
> >
> > while after the change she will do:
> > #include <libavutil/pix_fmt.h>
> >
> > and get done with the pix fmt stuff inclusion, so she may do:
> > #if (LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MINOR < X)
> > #include <libavutil/avutil.h>
> > #else
> > #include <libavutil/pix_fmt.h>
> > #endif
> 
> Can we please call it pixfmt.h instead?  For no rational reason, I
> like the look of that better.

No problem, if for the others is OK I'll apply it tomorrow naming the
file "pixfmt.h".

Regards.
-- 
FFmpeg = Funny and Faboulous Minimal Puristic Erotic Game