[FFmpeg-devel] XVMC Deathmatch

Ivan Kalvachev ikalvachev
Wed Feb 18 22:00:57 CET 2009

On 2/18/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> On 2/14/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:30:37PM +0000, Robert Swain wrote:
>> >> 2009/2/14 Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
>> >> > The review is below
>> >>
>> >> When is the competition set to end? Not that I want it to until
>> >> there's nothing left to do on the file, but I think it's a question
>> >> that needs to be asked.
>> >
>> > IIRC i originally said a period of 24h of no commits related to it
>> > or so ...
>> Would you define "related"
>> e.g. Are grammar fixes such commits.
>> imho one can improve wording indefinitely.
> are we in any hurry to end the deathmatch?

This is not what I've asked :E

> it would be better for the code if it would be running longer and
> insensitive clod awnser ...

You know, you can just ask me nicely.

> i dont need you doing any other work at the moment so it would be silly
> of me if i did something that stoped you working on xvmc.

Right now I've stopped completely working on it,
in fear that another forgotten space could bring some severe penalty.
( I know what thought just crossed your mind, forget it;)

> but if you want it to end sooner, just implement all that is left in my
> list :)

I've long lost the track of what is done and what remains.

And there is some stuff from the category "I have no idea what he
wants with that because the idea sounds really stupid, and he is not
(e.g. the av_assert_security() stuff).

As for designing and implementing the common hwaccel interface,
I don't think it is suited task for lone fighting gladiator.
It's better when these things are discussed and done together.

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list