[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Add some buffer sanity checks to indeo3
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Wed Feb 18 02:15:32 CET 2009
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:06:26PM -0500, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:58:31PM -0500, Alex Converse wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:13:02PM -0500, Alex Converse wrote:
> > > > > This helps with but doesn't completely fix 1-dog.avi
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alex Converse
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/indeo3.c b/libavcodec/indeo3.c
> > > > > index 6173c6f..3663d40 100644
> > > > > --- a/libavcodec/indeo3.c
> > > > > +++ b/libavcodec/indeo3.c
> > > > > @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static av_cold int indeo3_decode_init(AVCodecContext
> > > > *avctx)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -static unsigned long iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > > +static int iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > > const uint8_t *buf, int buf_size)
> > > > > {
> > > > > unsigned int image_width, image_height,
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -1006,6 +1006,11 @@ static unsigned long
> > > > iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > > hdr_pos = buf_pos;
> > > > > if(data_size == 0x80) return 4;
> > > > >
> > > > > + if(y_offset >= buf_size - 16 || v_offset >= buf_size - 16 ||
> > > > u_offset >= buf_size -16) {
> > > > > + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "y/u/v offset outside buffer\n");
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > if(flags & 0x200) {
> > > > > s->cur_frame = s->iv_frame + 1;
> > > > > s->ref_frame = s->iv_frame;
> > > >
> > > > FFMAX3(y_offset, u_offset, v_offset) >= buf_size - 16
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -1016,6 +1021,10 @@ static unsigned long
> > > > iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > >
> > > > > buf_pos = buf + 16 + y_offset;
> > > > > mc_vector_count = bytestream_get_le32(&buf_pos);
> > > > > + if(16 + y_offset + 2*mc_vector_count >= buf_size) {
> > > > > + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "mc_vector_count too large\n");
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > iv_Decode_Chunk(s, s->cur_frame->Ybuf, s->ref_frame->Ybuf,
> > > > image_width,
> > > > > image_height, buf_pos + mc_vector_count * 2,
> > > > cb_offset, hdr_pos, buf_pos,
> > > >
> > > > can overflow
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -1026,6 +1035,10 @@ static unsigned long
> > > > iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > >
> > > > > buf_pos = buf + 16 + v_offset;
> > > > > mc_vector_count = bytestream_get_le32(&buf_pos);
> > > > > + if(16 + v_offset + 2*mc_vector_count >= buf_size) {
> > > > > + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "mc_vector_count too
> > > > large\n");
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > iv_Decode_Chunk(s, s->cur_frame->Vbuf, s->ref_frame->Vbuf,
> > > > chroma_width,
> > > > > chroma_height, buf_pos + mc_vector_count * 2, cb_offset,
> > > > hdr_pos, buf_pos,
> > > > > @@ -1033,6 +1046,10 @@ static unsigned long
> > > > iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
> > > > >
> > > > > buf_pos = buf + 16 + u_offset;
> > > > > mc_vector_count = bytestream_get_le32(&buf_pos);
> > > > > + if(16 + u_offset + 2*mc_vector_count >= buf_size) {
> > > > > + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "mc_vector_count too
> > > > large\n");
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > iv_Decode_Chunk(s, s->cur_frame->Ubuf, s->ref_frame->Ubuf,
> > > > chroma_width,
> > > > > chroma_height, buf_pos + mc_vector_count * 2, cb_offset,
> > > > hdr_pos, buf_pos,
> > > >
> > > > so can these
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm aware iv_Decode_Chunk() can still overflow. It's a big monolithic
> > > function with no documentation. I didn't have the time nor the energy to try
> > > to unwind and make sense of it. Still these checks lessen the exposure of
> > > the unsafe code to bad input.
> >
> > your very checks overflow
> > 2*mc_vector_count being a example
> >
> > i am not asking you o fix other overflows in the code but the checks you add
> > should not contain overflows themselfs
> >
>
> Ahh, arithmetic overflow not buffer overflow.
>
> It feels a little awkward but I think I fixed it.
>
> Also whose crazy idea at Intel was it to make all those fields 32-bit?
> That man deserves a medal.
[...]
> @@ -1016,6 +1021,10 @@ static unsigned long iv_decode_frame(Indeo3DecodeContext *s,
>
> buf_pos = buf + 16 + y_offset;
> mc_vector_count = bytestream_get_le32(&buf_pos);
> + if(mc_vector_count > LONG_MAX || 2*mc_vector_count >= buf_size-16-y_offset) {
> + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "mc_vector_count too large\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
2LL*mc_vector_count >= buf_size-16-y_offset
should work too and be prettier
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us
and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what
is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090218/6f19fa53/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list