[FFmpeg-devel] Development polices of the FFmpeg
Thu Sep 11 10:16:14 CEST 2008
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:16:20AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 01:47 +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:32:25PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > >> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> > >>
> > >> > Sorry for butting in late, this has been lying in my drafts folder for
> > >> > far too long. Nonetheless I felt I should write something even though
> > >> > not every one of my opinions is thought out until the end...
> > >>
> > >> Did you have to hijack a thread? You of all people should know better...
> > >
> > > Huh? I replied to Roman's mail as usual, a mail from a thread with a
> > > changed subject. No innocent mail threads have been mistreated AFAICT.
> > Maybe my mail reader is buggy (though I've never seen it get threading
> > wrong), but here your mail shows up in a thread with subject "Droping
> > old scaler".
> Diego's message had "In-Reply-To:" pointing to the mail he quoted, but
> "References:" set as if he was replying to his own message from the
> "Droping old scaler" thread.
I guess that explains it as it is what I did. But it has always worked
fine in mutt if I replaced all of the text including Subject and
More information about the ffmpeg-devel