[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Mark symbols only used locally as static

Diego Biurrun diego
Sat Oct 4 12:59:18 CEST 2008

On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 12:47:03PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> M?ns Rullg?rd <mans at mansr.com> writes:
> >>> > ive no objections to giving diego#2 svn write access if this would
> >>> > help ...
> Does this involve some secret initiation ceremony that might harm
> health? :P I'm still recovering and that would be a huge turn down ;)
> At any rate I'm flattered by the offer. -- I guess the alternative would
> be to move to GIT? (hint: this is a cue for Luca)
> >>> (thats of course assuming that he agrees to our develpment policy
> >>> ...)
> It is quite reasonable, and I sincerely love the idea of peer review 
> > And gives us sufficient time to review his patch surges.  A "will
> > apply tomorrow" ultimatum after a 60-patch flood would not be
> > appreciated...
> I guess I'd sincerely rather keep a patch locally and either resend or
> ping it after a while rather than apply without an explicit ok. As I
> said I really like the idea of peer review, especially since when doing
> changes in series it's easy to overlook something, as after a while the
> code looks all the same...
> >> And assuming that he chooses a username different from mine ;-p
> >
> > I suggest "flamebait"...
> As long as it's not "lameeyes" :P

flameeyes then?  You still have not explicitly accepted our development
policy.  After you do, send me a gpg-encrypted password in private.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20081004/6dffb260/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list