[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] H.264 predictive lossless: again

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Nov 29 15:49:27 CET 2008

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 04:09:41AM -0800, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> > these belong to h264pred.c/h not here, h264.c is enough of a mess already,
> > no need to make it worse
> On this note, does this mean we have to assign them locations in
> H264PredContext?  

I think so, unless the overhead is worse than the optimized code that
could be used that way ...

> If so, how should they be arranged?  Should they
> have enough slots that we can index them with [HOR] and [VER], or
> should they just be named function pointers rather than arrays with
> mostly empty slots?

whichever is faster (and if equal then simpler)

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your
own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20081129/25ca57ae/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list