[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Some ra144.c simplifications

Vitor Sessak vitor1001
Mon May 19 09:36:03 CEST 2008


Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:45AM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>>>  > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>>  >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 05:45:29PM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>>>  >>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>>  >>>> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 04:50:03PM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>>>  >>>>> Hi,
>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>  >>>>> libavcodec/ra144.c really needs some cleanup. I'll start with the
>>>>>  >>>>> following:
>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>  >>>>> ra144_indent.diff: Reindent the whole file. Since there was no
>>>>>  >>>>> substantial change in this file since it inclusion in 2003, I don't
>>>>>  >>>>> think there is any problem in making its indentation inline with the
>>>>>  >>>>> rest of FFmpeg.
>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>  >>>>> ra144_unpack_rewrite.diff: Rewrite completely unpack_input()
>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>  >>>>> ra144_simp{1,2}.diff: minor simplifications
>>>>>  >>>> all ok if you have tested your code
>>>>>  >>> Next round:
>>>>>  >>>
>>>>>  >>> ra144_simp{3,4}.diff: minor simplifications (FFSWAP, unused stuff
>>>>>  >>> removal)
>>>>>  >> ok
>>>>>  >>> ra144_sqrt.diff: remove ff_sqrt reimplementation and its corresponding
>>>>>  >>> big table (output is not anymore binary-identical but this function is
>>>>>  >>> more accurate, not less). Nice thing we have now a fast ff_sqrt :-)
>>>>>  >> by how much does the output differ?
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > According to tiny_psnr for drummers.14.ra
>>>>>  > stddev: 28.84 PSNR:18.92 bytes:5369856
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > which looks a lot to me (even if playing the file I can't hear any
>>>>>  > difference). I suggest to leave this for after the rest of the cleanup.
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  >>> ra144_split_val.diff: glob->val is unrelated with the rest of the
>>>>>  >>> unpacked buffer. This patch split its table out of the others
>>>>>  >> ok
>>>>>  >>> and move
>>>>>  >>> it parsing to a more reasonable place.
>>>>>  >> not ok, the place does not look reasonable to me
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > I don't know if it is this that you mean, but the unpack_input()
>>>>>  > function is a bit senseless. It read three unrelated things (10 codebook
>>>>>  > indexes, a codebook index for val and 4 4-byte blocks) from the
>>>>>  > bitstream and put everything in the same buffer. The attached patch (to
>>>>>  > be applied after ra144_rename_valtab.diff) simply remove this function
>>>>>  > and move the bitstream reading to where the data is actually needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>  ok (I assume that every cleanup has been tested and has bit identical
>>>>>  output ...)
>>>> I do test them.
>>>>
>>>> More cleanup (to be applied after the previous ok'ed patches):
>>>>
>>>> ra144_trim_context.diff : Remove a lot of vars from context
>>>> ra144_trim_context2.diff: Modify add_wav() to remove another
>>>> context var
>>> all ok
>> Yet some more:
>>
> [...]
>> ra144_uint8_tables.diff.gz: Declare as (u)int8_t tables that fit in one
>> byte (yes, that makes the indentation of ra144.h inconsistent. I'll fix
>> the rest of the file later)
>
> this needs to be split in 3-4 patches
>
> short -> (u)int8_t change
> [] -> [][]
> hex -> decimal

Now [] -> [][] for etable{1,2}

-Vitor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ra144_etable.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 59965 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080519/2d982704/attachment.diff>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list