[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [2/??] [3/3] Filter graphs - Parser for a graph description
Robert Swain
robert.swain
Sat Mar 22 10:09:55 CET 2008
Hello,
On 21/03/2008, vmrsss <vmrsss at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2008, at 14:40, Robert Swain wrote:
> >>> The diagram for the second of the two examples might be clearer if
> >>> it
> >>> were drawn as follows:
> >>>
> >>> ---> filter1 ---> (abc)
> >>> |
> >>> v
> >>> (def) ---> filter2 --->
[...]
> > Originally you wrote:
> >
> > filter1->filter2
> > | ^
> > v |
> > (abc) (def)
> >
> > ...gives...
> >
> > filter1, split, (filter2 * nop)
>
> >
> >
> > Now you're writing (substituting filter1, split back in...):
> >
> > (filter1, split) * nop, nop * filter2
>
> Wait a minute: this graph is different from that of your previous
> email which is just reported above. The differences being that here
> filter1 has no input stream, while above it's got one, and here (abc)
> is the first output stream, while above is the 2nd. So the graph above
> is
Apologies. I thought the diagram was just being lazy and omitting
unnamed inputs. That's probably why I didn't understand this example's
syntax in the first place...
Rob
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list