[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

Serguei Miridonov mirsev
Fri Jun 6 19:19:41 CEST 2008

On Friday 30 May 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:12:40AM -0600, Loren Merritt wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Jeff Downs wrote:
> > > The warning for interlaced + spatial direct was (accidentally I
> > > think) removed in r11806 when MBAFF + spatial direct was
> > > implemented. So I am for restoring it as per the patch.
> >
> > Not accidental. I removed the warning because I was unaware of
> > any difference between PAFF direct and MBAFF direct, and I still
> > don't see anywhere in the standard that they differ.
> hmm, then maybe i was wrong, i assumed that there was a difference
> mainly because of various "fixmes" in h264.c and
> that your commit which implemented spatial direct + interlacing did
> explicitly mention MBAFF but not PAFF
> Either way, if spatial-direct-PAFF is supposed to work then we are
> back to the question why some files with it do not work ...

Sorry for pinging... Just curious, is anybody working on this 
issue460? Is there any hope to have the solution soon?


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list