[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Mark Buechler]

Hi

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:45:16AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:02:01AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov
> > wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > > > If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
> > > > > > > Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael, I do not ask you why just because this is a
> > > > > > developing list. But could you please post a few links which
> > > > > > you think best explain pro and contra of 24/p video? For me
> > > > > > 60/i video looks much much smoother than 24/p. On TV or
> > > > > > computer monitor -- does not matter. So,if 24/p is so good,
> > > > > > what I do wrong with 24/p video captured by my camcorder?
> > > > >
> > > > > then use 60/p
> > > >
> > > > Camcorder does not support that. So?
> > >
> > > Complain to the company that made it ...
> >
> > You are so kind. Thank you.
>
> What did you expect?
> Something like:
> "Ill spend 1+ weeks and fix the bugs that i dont care about at all"
> ?


> Why dont you fix the bug? Or help cleaning up h264.c if first is too
> hard?
>
> And seriously, if enough people complain about the lack of proper
> progressive support in camcorders, maybe the industry will eventually
> listen.
> And its a good idea even with all the *AFF code working.
>
> [...]


You don't give yourself enough credit. I have every confidence you could
have it fixed in 6 days if you tried.

- Mark.