[FFmpeg-devel] How to handle compiler warnings
Benjamin Zores
ben
Tue Jan 29 13:30:42 CET 2008
On Jan 29, 2008 1:18 PM, Aurelien Jacobs <aurel at gnuage.org> wrote:
> Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>
> > Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > The topic has come up again, it's time to discuss the subject. I
> > > propose to try to avoid compiler warnings as much as possible in
> > > order to
> > >
> > > - have cleaner code,
> > > - have important warnings not be drowned out,
> > > - make FFmpeg a programming textbook.
> > >
> > > This does not include warning fixes that slow things down or
> > > obfuscate the code, but if in doubt I personally would err on the
> > > side of fixing the warning.
>
> I support this.
>
> > IMNSHO all warnings should be fixed and warning-is-error turned on.
>
> I disagree about turning on warning-is-error. Different compiler
> versions on different arch produce different warnings.
> With warning-is-error, building svn tree (our only supported
> distribution) will become a pain for non-developers.
I second this.
I have projects that compiles fine on x86_32 with -Wall -W
and does produce some warnings on x86_64 (same compiler version).
Having -Werror is a bit too harsh, but having -W and try to fix
warnings is already a lot of work.
Ben
--
"My life, and by extension everyone else's is meaningless."
Bender, Futurama
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list