[FFmpeg-devel] Filtering clueless-user spam from the lists

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Wed Jan 23 16:56:43 CET 2008


On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:49:05PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > the fallacy of your reasoning is
> > > All bad ones contain X thus X is bad and should be banned
> > 
> > >
> > > correct would be
> > > how often does X do bad things? or
> > > how many mails from outlook are broken and how many not?
> > >
> > > [...]
> > 
> > 
> > and if they turned out to be > 2/3 ?
> 
> i just looked at the mails of ffmpeg-dev (not all just the last 1 or 2 years)
> and heres a list of user-agent and X-mailer headers from all thread hijackers
> that is without a 're:' and 'in-reply-to:'
[...]
> so it does not appear your statement is true for thread hijacks

that is, banning outlook wont make a difference for the number of
thread hijacks

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities
are wrong. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080123/b8b0a7d0/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list