[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] dnxhd get_pixels_4x8_sym sse
Baptiste Coudurier
baptiste.coudurier
Fri Dec 12 01:21:57 CET 2008
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:22:15PM -0800, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:39:05PM -0800, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> $subject, I don't polute dsputil more since this is used only by dnxhd
>>>> encoder AFAIK.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> also isnt it 8x4 instead of 4x8 (that being a seperate fix unrelated to this
>>> patch of course) i just noticed it ...
>> Well it's 4 rows of 8 pixels, I guess it depends on how you see it.
>
> of course
> i just think the width x height variant is more common in libavcodec and
> various ITU/MPEG specs than height x width
>
> but besides the bikeshed of which to take, it should be consistant throughout
> libav*
Ok, changed and applied separately.
>> [...]
>>
>> Index: libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c (revision 16051)
>> +++ libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c (working copy)
>
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>> #include "dnxhdenc.h"
>>
>> int dct_quantize_c(MpegEncContext *s, DCTELEM *block, int n, int qscale, int *overflow);
>> +static void dnxhd_get_pixels_4x8(DCTELEM *restrict block, const uint8_t *pixels, int line_size);
>>
>> #define LAMBDA_FRAC_BITS 10
>>
>
> maybe functions should be reordered to avoid this? (that of course is a
> seperate issue ...)
Yes, of course, just moved the function separately.
> [...]
>> +static void get_pixels_4x8_sym_sse2(DCTELEM *block, const uint8_t *pixels, int line_size)
>> +{
>> + __asm__ volatile(
>> + "pxor %%xmm7, %%xmm7 \n\t"
>> + "movq (%0), %%xmm0 \n\t"
>> + "movq (%0, %2), %%xmm1 \n\t"
>> + "movq (%0, %2,2), %%xmm2 \n\t"
>> + "movq (%0, %3), %%xmm3 \n\t"
>> + "punpcklbw %%xmm7, %%xmm0 \n\t"
>> + "punpcklbw %%xmm7, %%xmm1 \n\t"
>> + "punpcklbw %%xmm7, %%xmm2 \n\t"
>> + "punpcklbw %%xmm7, %%xmm3 \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm0, (%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm1, 16(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm2, 32(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm3, 48(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm3 , 64(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm2 , 80(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm1 , 96(%1) \n\t"
>> + "movdqa %%xmm0, 112(%1) \n\t"
>> + :
>> + : "r" (pixels), "r" (block), "r" ((x86_reg)line_size), "r" ((x86_reg)line_size*3)
>
> maybe
> "movq (%0), %%xmm0 \n\t"
> "add %2, %0 \n\t"
> "movq (%0), %%xmm1 \n\t"
> "movq (%0, %2), %%xmm2 \n\t"
> "movq (%0, %2,2), %%xmm3 \n\t"
>
> is faster (it doesnt need line_size*3), then, maybe not
> this would require pixels to be "+r" ...
>
> whichever is faster the patch (with the faster one) is ok
Your variant seems a little bit faster so I applied yours.
--
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list