[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] Multiple inclusion guards in headers

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sun Aug 17 19:17:22 CEST 2008

This is the second issue id like to see clarified

Do we require headers that do not need multiple inclusion guards out of
technical reasons to have multiple inclusion guards?
technical here is speed, compiler warnings or errors, or spec compliance

My vote is of course, no, as it makes the headers bigger and thus means
more to read aka worse readability.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did it is even more stupid. If everything ms did were stupid they
would be bankrupt already.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080817/d8f1b673/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list