[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Some ARM VFP optimizations (vector_fmul, vector_fmul_reverse, float_to_int16)

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sun Apr 20 23:59:45 CEST 2008

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:33:43PM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> I also still see absolutely no problem with stack realignment code, it
> takes only a few lines in the source and DOES NOT expand to anything on 
> modern systems which use EABI. So all the talks about the extra code in the
> inner loop do not make any sense. If you still want to screw up ARM legacy
> systems which can't upgrade their broken toolchains, why do you still care
> about gcc 2.95 support? I don't see the logic...

Then you must be blind.
If i didnt care about old systems i would have approved your stack realign
because it, as you say does not affect new systems its #ifdefd out on them.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080420/8d0a0f7d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list