[FFmpeg-devel] libavutil simd

[Michael Niedermayer]

Hi

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:19:43PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:27:12AM -0600, Loren Merritt wrote:
> >> Any objections to moving cputest.c and related code to libavutil? I'd like 
> >> to simd some of the lavu functions, but cpu detection depends on lavc.
> > 
> > cputest.c + the parts needed from the headers are ok
> > 
> 
> How that relates to my old email about the same subject?

cputest.c contains clean code to detect various x86 extensions

vs.

you did not suggest any clean way to detect altivec (likely because there
is no clean way) sigill catching, fork, /proc/* parsing none of them is
something i will accept in libavutil and actually i wouldnt accept it in
libavcodec either if it where submitted by someone now

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20071001/ad352f39/attachment.pgp>