[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] read metadata in FLAC demuxer
Rich Felker
dalias
Mon Oct 1 05:18:52 CEST 2007
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:52:35PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:47:18PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:48:08AM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is a patch to fix issue 187 in the FFmpeg Issue Tracker, "flac decoder
> >>>> fails with large metadata".
> >>>>
> >>>> For raw FLAC files, the metadata header(s) are read in the demuxer rather
> >>>> than the decoder. This correctly skips any irrelevant metadata blocks, and
> >>>> it also parses vorbiscomment info.
> >>> what happens with flac in avi and matroska ?
> >> True, it should be handled in those demuxers as well. And I do see your
> >> point as far as code duplication. I'm working on a better solution with
> >> shared code between the decoder and all the demuxers.
> >
> > For other formats, metadata should not be in Ogg-specific format but
> > in whatever standard format the container uses.. I suspect that was
> > Michael's point..
>
> I see. Well the streaminfo data should be in the same format no matter
> what the container. Also, I believe a series of FLAC metadata blocks is
> standard for extradata in raw FLAC, Matroska, and other containers
> besides Ogg. AFAIK, Ogg is the only one which uses its own unique
> layout for FLAC metadata. The solution I'm working on takes this into
> account.
Matroska officially stores in-band FLAC-format metadata instead of
putting it in the Matroska headers where it belongs? I really doubt
that. If it's done it's probably some hack warez groups are doing and
not something officially sanctioned.. at least I can't imagine them
doing something THAT dumb..
Rich
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list