[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] add dca and vc1 objects to Makefile when parsers are enabled

Benoit Fouet benoit.fouet
Sun May 6 18:39:27 CEST 2007

Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 08:38:24PM +0300, Kostya wrote:
>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:06:17PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:07:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:54:56AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:28:57AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>>>>>> seen on ffmpeg user mailing list
>>>>>> when disabling en/decoders, those two objects are not built even though
>>>>>> they are needed to parse
>>>>> The patch is OK, but I think it would be better to put the dca and vc1
>>>>> parser code in parser.c along with the rest of the parsers.  The parser
>>>>> code is a very small part of both decoders.
>>>> _all_ parsers should be put in seperate files. putting them in parser.c
>>>> is an extreemly ugly hack and while i agreed for ac3 as noone was willing
>>>> to solve that properly i will NOT agree to move the other parsers to the
>>>> wrong file too!
>>> So let's start.  Here is a patch that moves the dca parser to its own file.
>>> I have named it dca_parser.c.  That looks like a sane naming scheme to
>>> me.  I have created dca.h and dca_parser.c with svn cp in my local tree
>>> but I have diffed them against /dev/null to send here, multithousand
>>> line patches are not particularly easy to read.
>> I have no objections against this nor vc1_parser done this way.
>> Apply anytime. If I had enough time I could do it myself.
> Applied.  vc1_parser.c on its way.
great, as far as i've seen on the cvs log list, it was the beginning of
a long list :)

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list