[Ffmpeg-devel] Naming conventions

[Baptiste Coudurier]

Michel Bardiaux wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi
>>
> [snip]
> 
>>
>> huh? what is facetious? me saying that the naming convention should
>> clearly
>> say what type and action is or me pointing at cases where your
>> suggestion is ambiguous?
>> or are you trying to say that you have no real arguments?
>> or are you trying to say that you will decide all names based on
>> unwritten
>> rules and everyone who doesnt understand you rules is facetious?
> 
> *Now* we have reached flame temperature...
> 
>>
>> also its funny that on nut-devel you where nitpicking that the spec wasnt
>> clear enough and now you attack my for trying to clarify a really
>> ambiguous
>> single line suggestion of a nameing convention
>>
> Problem is, everyone has been beating around the bush trying to avoid
> using 'the O word', but its a fact that C++ (or rather, OO methodology
> in general) was developped with the goal of formalizing this issue.
> Whether their solution was a good one is of course a different issue!
> 

Kinda, well let's stop using C and let's use a language which supports
set_timebase().avstream

-- 
Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A.                                    http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312