[FFmpeg-devel] MPEG-2 Acceleration Refactor
Diego Biurrun
diego
Sun Jun 17 12:27:26 CEST 2007
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:37:02PM -0700, Greg Hulands wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2007, at 6:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:44:21PM -0700, Greg Hulands wrote:
> >> --- mpeg12.c (revision 9339)
> >> +++ mpeg12.c (working copy)
> >> @@ -47,25 +47,25 @@
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ENCODERS
> >> static void mpeg1_encode_block(MpegEncContext *s,
> >> - DCTELEM *block,
> >> - int component);
> >> + DCTELEM *block,
> >> + int component);
> >
> > cosmetic
> >
> > note a single cosmetic (whitespace only) change in a patch which
> > contains
> > functional changes leads to rejection of the patch
> > such changes belong into a seperate patch
>
> I'm confused. The first patch I submitted today, you rejected because
> I had used tabs - fair enough. How was the original non-cosmetic code
> allowed in the repository if one of the first rules of rejection is
> cosmetics?
>
> I am using spaces now so I don't know why in the email it looks like
> the cosmetic problems are still there. Maybe mailmail is doing
> something. I will attach the file next time round instead of pasting
> it in.
>
> So just to clarify for this patch, you don't want me to fix the
> cosmetic problems with the function prototypes, but all code that I
> touch, you do?
He wants you to send in a patch without whitespace-only changes. Feel
free to send in a separate patch for these issues.
Diego
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list