[FFmpeg-devel] Proposed patch

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Wed Aug 8 01:46:38 CEST 2007


Hi

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:41:53PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnick wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 02:40 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:22:02PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > > 
> > > two questions: 
> > >    1. Does an attached patch look ok?
> > 
> > this changes one of the most speed critical things in lavc so this needs
> > extensive benchmarks, x86+ppc mpeg4 decoding at minimum
> > (more non x86 archs would be very welcome too)
> 
> Hi Michael, 
> 
> here's what I did: I added START_TIMER/STOP_TIMER around
> avcodec_decode_video and experimented with MPEG4 recording
> of Lord of the Rings. I compared the # of dezicycles before
> and after the patch. On x86 the change seems to be a wash +-0.5%.
> 
> On SPARC I plan to use Sun's Performance Analyzer to get
> the same result (sorry, I'm currently swamped with LinuxWorld
> otherwise I would have had the results already).
> 
> Now, the questions that I have are:
> 
>    * does this seem to be enough to justify the patch or do you 
>      want me to run a specific kind of benchmarking?
>    * has the ppc question been fully answered (again, I don't have PPC)?

yes

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
-- Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070808/d281990d/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list