[Ffmpeg-devel] Two ASF related bugs and fixes

Kohn Emil Dan emild
Wed May 10 12:37:55 CEST 2006


Hi,

I'll try to fix the first patch this weekend.

 							Regards,
 								Emil

On Tue, 9 May 2006, Guillaume Poirier wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:11:06PM +0300, emild at cs.technion.ac.il wrote:
>
>>> I have found two bugs related to ffmpeg's ASF file format.
>>>
>>> 1) The first bug has to do with the ASF writer. The problem is caused by the
>>> fact that the size of the padding is not adjusted to include the size of
>>> the padding length field. This causes the last byte of the payload to be
>>> overwritten with zeroes before it is written to disk, thus yielding an invalid
>>> bitstream.
>>> mplayer and even ffmpeg complain when such streams are passed to them.
>>
>>
>> i think asf_packet_size_left should be set correctly in put_frame()
>> not be changed later because one field length has been forgotten ...
>>
>> also note that the regression test checksums if they change must be
>> included in the patch
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>> 2) The second bug has to do with the ASF file format reader. The reader ignores
>>> the size of the ASF data object and keeps on reading even beyond it. Therefore
>>> if the ASF file includes an index object at its end, the reader will treat the
>>> index like data, but of course will fail since it thinks that the data is
>>> corrupted. When reading an asf file with an index object, ffmpeg will complain
>>> at the end of the file that it read an invalid header.
>>
>>
>> patch ok i think (after remocing tabs and such of coarse)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> What's the status of these patches? I don't think they have been
> committed, but I may have missed it.
>
> Did I understand correctly that out of the two patches, only the
> second was ok?
>
> Emil, it would be good if you could to fix the first patch, according
> to Michael's comments, please.
>
> Guillaume
>





More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list