[Ffmpeg-devel] Matroska Patch

[Måns Rullgård]

Ian Caulfield said:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>
>>
>> Ian Caulfield said:
>>>
>>> Is it just me, or will the block_time < 0 always be false, as it's an
>>> unsigned value? (Obviously this bug isn't introduced by the patch)
>>
>> No, block_time is signed.  It's the cluster time that's unsigned.  Thank
>> the matroska devs for this mess.  Was it really necessary?
>
> Sorry if I'm being thick, but isn't it declared here:
>
> +                uint64_t block_time;
>
> ... as an unsigned int?

That's wrong.  It should be signed.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com