[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: [PATCH] x264 avc encoding, movenc avcC, ctts

[Richard S.]

Baptiste COUDURIER schrieb:
> Hi
>
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>   
>> [...]
>>
>> yes, and patch looks ok, can be applied assuming regression tests and
>> such still work as well as before ...
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>     
>
> Here is an updated patch. Setting pts correctly for video and audio
> track. Regression tests are ok.
>
> Also an updated patch for ftyp. Since we do not create an "iods" atom
> and BIFS, OD tracks we cannot use "mp42" brand but still we can use
> "mp41" brand which does not require "iods" atom. It is still better than
> "isom".
>
>   
Where did you get the info with "mp41" an OD is not needed to call the
file mp4 file version 1.
As far as I know is there no difference to "mp42".  An IOD isn't
mandatory but if you have a Presentation it is needed, like with the
ctts box/atom and B-frames.  

But it is your choice. There are enough files with ftyp "mp42" without
IOD/BIFS and OD around. It  dosen't matter if there will some more of
this kind.
Like bond said nobody cares.
 
Richard