[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cook: use bitshift instead of pow(f) func
Benjamin Larsson
banan
Fri Feb 10 13:45:36 CET 2006
Hi,
Alexander Strasser wrote:
>Hi,
>
> basically it is all in the subject. Why?
>
>1 Because it is an integer operation anyway and this way it
> is easier to recognize it. The produced tables are identical.
>2 The powf() function is not that widely supported yet, so when
> there is no need for it i don't see any reason to harm portability.
>
> Patch attached.
>
> If this solution is considered flawed or not acceptable for
>one or the other reason, then at least consider changing powf()
>to pow().
>
> Alex (beastd)
>
>
If this also works on BE systems commit it. And while you are at it you
can continue to integerize the code :)
MvH
Benjamin Larsson
--
"incorrect information" is an oxymoron. Information is, by definition, factual, correct.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list