[Ffmpeg-devel] Google SoC: We're In!

Diego Biurrun diego
Thu Apr 27 16:07:11 CEST 2006

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> > > Implementation is nasty. Visually WMV is basically nasty. I dont see any
> > > improvement :)
> > 
> > Well, our WMV2 decoder still has a major shortcoming in that it decodes
> > many samples, those with J-frames with very heavy artifacts.  Whatever..
> I have never encountered a WMV1/2/3 sample in the wild. Only for certain
> content, that I dont download. Is that just I?

You must be living on a strange planet then ;)  WMV* is popular for
internet streaming for example and better than RealVideo because we have
a free decoder.  If it weren't incomplete it would be even better.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list