[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: On2 vs libvp62
Fri Apr 21 09:28:19 CEST 2006
2006/4/21, Balatoni Denes <dbalatoni at programozo.hu>:
> cs?t?rt?k 20 ?prilis 2006 05.22-kor Rich Felker ezeket a bolcs gondolatokat
> fogalmazta meg:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:36:39AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > > bad it is. The reason bad closed source is perhaps more wide-spread
> > > is that behind a bad commercial product there is usually a marketing
> > > department that may be able to spin something that makes the product
> > > sell despite its flaws. An open source product is promoted by its
> > > quality alone, meaning that the bad ones won't be used by many people.
> > No, unfortunately "open source" has marketing departments too. Just
> > look at Xiph.org! Or an even better example: Redhat and all their
> > horrible bugware/bloatware (GNOME, gcc, glibc, ...).
> What is your point? The projects you mentioned (you didn't mention vorbis, but
> mentioned xiph) have accomplishments, and have gained somewhat widespread
> acceptance. You probably don't have such accomplishments - definietly not as
> an "ffmpeg developer" - so why not just shut up ? (btw I don't have such
> accomplishments either, but at least I have contributed to ffmpeg more than
> 10 lines of trivial fixes - not much more, but still).
Microsoft also have quite big accomplishments and have gained
This doesn't mean that their software is not horrible bugware and bloatware.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel