[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Basic H.264 encoder

[Måns Rullgård]

Mike Melanson <mike at multimedia.cx> writes:

> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi
>> iam both happy and unhappy to see a h264 encoder being developed for
>> lavc
>> happy obviously as h.264 encoding is no doubt the most important thing which
>> is missing
>> unhappy as this will probably seperate x264 and lavc further over time which
>> is the opposite of what i would have hoped for ...
>> then again i wont accept or reject patches due to political reasons so if
>> your encoder is clean and otherwise fit for cvs ill apply it
>
> 	Have we agreed upon a new FourCC for this codec? I don't think
> 	'F264' is taken yet.

Why would it need another code?  If it's H.264 compatible, though not
complete, any existing H.264 code will do.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com