[Ffmpeg-devel] build broken again...

[François Revol]

> Hi
> 
> On Monday 09 May 2005 19:53, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Monday 09 May 2005 18:53, Fran?ois Revol wrote:
> > >> > Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> writes:
> > >> > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:32:11AM -0700, Jacob Meuser 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:35:09PM -0400, Rich Felker 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:08:08PM +0200, Fran?ois Revol 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > OPTFLAGS=-O3 -Wall -Wno-switch -DPIC -fomit-frame-
> > > > > > > > > pointer
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > (with PIC of course)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > PIC does not work, afaik. Stop insisting on using it.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> PIC does work, and it is needed some places (ok, not if you 
> > > > > > > don't
> > >> > >> use shared libraries, but that is another discussion/flame 
> > > > > > > war).
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Exactly, not needed. Also, shared libraries work fine 
> > > > > > without PIC.
> > >> >
> > >> > Non-PIC shared libraries only work with some (dynamic) 
> > > > > linkers.  I've
> > >> > seen quite a few that don't work.  Go ahead, tell me they 
> > > > > suck.  I
> > >> > don't care.
> > >>
> > >> They would also force the loaders to use copies of text segments 
> > > > of
> > >> those instead of sharing the same if they are loaded twice or at
> > >> different locations.
> > >> Yes I know you have 2GB of RAM but not everyone has or can.
> > >
> > > -> they should be loaded at the same location in the virtual 
> > > address
> > > space of every process
> >
> > What if two libraries use the same address region?
> 
> what if 2 files in one directory have the same name?

That might probably be possible in Hurd :D
Actually fs indices in BFS are some "kind" of directories which are 
permitted to have duplicated entries.

> or what if 2 files use 
> the same disk sector

I think XFS or reiser can do that.

> or, ...

perforce does understand ... as "recursive *"

Fran?ois.