[Ffmpeg-devel] Visual C++ compatibility
Wed May 4 00:25:31 CEST 2005
"Fran?ois Revol" <revol at free.fr> writes:
>> "Fran?ois Revol" <revol at free.fr> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > It's attempted every now and then, but people usually soon
>> > > > realize
>> >> > the
>> >> > futility of such an undertaking.
>> >> >
>> >> Then what IDE is the best for reading the code? Emacs?
>> > XEmacs for ex runs very well in windows... and looks even nicer
>> > than
>> > under X11... but not as nice as in BeOS =)
>> Matter of taste. The look of a program like xemacs depends largely
>> on what fonts you use.
> IT's not about fonts only... well yeah, AA helps a lot, but since we
> get that by default on native apps, why not XEmacs also =)
Isn't that AA fonts I see in that shot? Or did I misunderstand
> That really doesn't compare to this:
The ugliness there is caused by bad fonts, and nothing else. My
xemacs under X (Linux) looks like http://inprovide.com/~mru/xemacs.png
> As I said, eevn in win23 it looks better than X11:
> I think it has to do with scrollbars :D
Yes, the scrollbars and the menus. Not that big a deal, if you ask me.
mru at inprovide.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel