[Ffmpeg-devel] [patch] *BSD bktr grab support

[Jacob Meuser]

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:37:20PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 21:17, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:04:13AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Thursday 19 May 2005 05:42, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > here is the cleaned up patch for gab support for the bktr driver
> > > > found on *BSD systems.
> > > >
> > > > the license is now LGPL, I changed the tabs to 4 spaces, added a
> > > > couple comments, and took out an #if 0 block and a CVS Id
> > > > that were accidently left in the last version.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- libavformat/grab.c	30 Apr 2005 21:43:58 -0000	1.34
> > > > +++ libavformat/grab.c	19 May 2005 03:37:10 -0000
> > > > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static AVInputFormat video_grab_device_format = {
> > > > -    "video4linux",
> > > > +    "video_device",
> > >
> > > is it theoretically impossible for v4l and bktr to coexist on the same
> > > machine?
> [...]
> > sorry for the delay.  I have fixed the above issues.  new patch
> 
> hmm, doesnt seem so ...

I'm not sure what would be the best as far as ffmpeg is concerned.

like this in ffmpeg.c ~ line 259?

#ifdef CONFIG_V4L
static char *video_grab_format = "video4linux";
#else
#ifdef CONFIG_BKTR
static char *video_grab_format = "bktr";
#endif
#endif

does a way to specify video_grab_format at runtime already exist?
I couldn't find how that would happen.  would that need to be
added?  I would think so, or there is no way to use both v4l and
bktr in the same ffmpeg binary, and thus the "conflict" isn't really
solved.

-- 
<jakemsr at jakemsr.com>