[FFmpeg-cvslog] r25385 - trunk/libavformat/mpegenc.c

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Thu Oct 7 20:33:19 CEST 2010


On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:17:10PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:16:20PM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, michael <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > > Warn if muxing mpeg ps is attempted without a VBV buffer size.
> > > >
> > > > --- trunk/libavformat/mpegenc.c Thu Oct ?7 03:57:35 2010 ? ? ? ?(r25384)
> > > > +++ trunk/libavformat/mpegenc.c Thu Oct ?7 03:57:39 2010 ? ? ? ?(r25385)
> > > > @@ -367,8 +367,10 @@ static int mpeg_mux_init(AVFormatContext
> > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? if (st->codec->rc_buffer_size)
> > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stream->max_buffer_size = 6*1024 + st->codec->rc_buffer_size/8;
> > > > - ? ? ? ? ? ?else
> > > > + ? ? ? ? ? ?else{
> > > 
> > > Just two days ago people asked you to put whitespace after keywords.
> > 
> > yes and iam not doing it, you should vote on me being leader accordingly.
> 
> The attitude you show when criticized...
> 
> > also IMHO, the one who said it loud enough for me to remember it at all is
> > diego (on the phone ;) ) and he
> > neither maintains C code nor is he contributing C code. And this is stuff
> > that should be decided by the people falling in these 2 categories
> 
> Except of course for Stefano two days ago.  And who would dare to
> criticize you when you immediately threaten to kill the critic or
> yourself?

killing myself is my choice ;)
and i didnt threten to kill any critic


> 
> > IMHO such whitespace cosmetics go too far and ive never asked others to
> > follow such nitpickery. Especially not if they feel strongly about it
> 
> You do nitpick people about vertical alignment.

but i would drop the issue if someone felt strong about it.


> 
> I'll also have to note that K&R style is mandated in the developer
> guidelines.  But those guidelines are just something you use to
> smack people over the head, not something you feel bound by
> yourself.

Ill quote the policy for you, and id like to politely but sternly point out
that people should _read_ the policy before accusing others about breaking it.


   We refuse source indentation and other cosmetic changes if they are mixed
   with functional changes, such commits will be rejected and removed. Every
                                                                       ^^^^  
   developer has his own indentation style, you should not change it. Of course
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   if you (re)write something, you can use your own style, even though we would
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   prefer if the indentation throughout FFmpeg was consistent (Many projects
   force a given indentation style - we do not.). If you really need to make
   indentation changes (try to avoid this), separate them strictly from real
   changes.

Its you breaking this continously not me. You want things to be different
and you always wanted things to be different but preaching everywhere that
things are different doesnt make them so.

And the other part (not part of the policy) about style says that:
    Indent size is 4.
    The presentation is one inspired by 'indent -i4 -kr -nut'.
    The TAB character is forbidden outside of Makefiles as is any
    form of trailing whitespace. Commits containing either will be
    rejected by the Subversion repository.

This says 'INSPIRED by 'indent -i4 -kr -nut'' it does not say follow the
indent output to the last whitespace is mandatory

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.
-- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/attachments/20101007/9415cff9/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list