[FFmpeg-cvslog] r22522 - in trunk: configure libavcodec/Makefile libavcodec/dsputil.c libavcodec/dsputil.h libavcodec/dwt.c libavcodec/dwt.h libavcodec/ivi_dsp.c libavcodec/snow.c libavcodec/snow.h libavcodec/x86/...

[Alex Converse]

2010/3/14 M?ns Rullg?rd <mans at mansr.com>:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>
> R> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:38:38PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>>>
>>> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0100, mru wrote:
>>> >> Author: mru
>>> >> Date: Sun Mar 14 18:50:12 2010
>>> >> New Revision: 22522
>>> >>
>>> >> Log:
>>> >> Separate DWT from snow and dsputil
>>> >>
>>> >> This moves the DWT functions from snow.c and dsputil.c to a file of
>>> >> their own. ?A new struct, DWTContext, holds the function pointers
>>> >> previously part of DSPContext.
>>> >>
>>> >> Added:
>>> >> ? ?trunk/libavcodec/dwt.c
>>> >> ? ?trunk/libavcodec/dwt.h
>>> >> ? ? ? - copied, changed from r22521, trunk/libavcodec/snow.h
>>> >
>>> > is dwt.c not missing a svn cp?
>>>
>>> It's only a tiny part of snow.c, the diff would be enormous. ?Besides,
>>> git blame has no trouble tracking the origin of the code.
>>
>> we are using svn for trunk, it would thus be nice if svn metadata would
>> stay correct.
>> and gits tracking is guessing, svn stores the true origin.
>
> Nevertheless git blame give much more details, and correct,
> information. ?You should try it some time.
>

Now that git-notes seem like a relatively mature way to annotate
commit messages perhaps it's time to revisit transitioning to git.

--Alex