[FFmpeg-cvslog] r23977 - trunk/libavcodec/rl2.c

[Måns Rullgård]

Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:09:27PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:12:02PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > perfectly fine, then close your account, iam sick of these discussions
>> >> 
>> >> Are you seriously asking Diego's account to be closed over a forgotten
>> >> update of a comment, not even originally committed by him?  If that is
>> >> not you abusing your self-appointed powers, I do now know what is.
>> >
>> > No, you clip too much. there was something along the line of i wont
>> > revert it above.
>> 
>> He said he did not _want_ to revert it, and gave good reasons for
>> this.  Huge difference.
>
> he said reverting introduces a bug. as far as iam aware it adds a warning
> that points closer to the true cause of the mismatch not a new bug.

The two of you evidently have different notions of what constitutes a
bug.

>> > If he does not revert these bad commits nor fixes them differently then
>> > and only then ive asked him to close his account.
>> 
>> Under what authority do you make such a request?
>
> Everyone is free to do what i suggest or to ignore me.

What you have been doing is much closer to demanding than it is suggesting.

>> > Its impossible to have someone on the team who doesnt send patches, then
>> > commits bad changes and then refuses to revert them. 
>> 
>> That description applies rather accurately to yourself.
>
> which change did i commit without patch

You never submit patches.

> that some other developer asked me to revert that i didnt do revert?

Rather than scream revert, I prefer to simply fix things in code I
maintain.  That is why I have not asked you to revert anything.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com